The world’s richest man, Elon Musk, has secured victory in a legal battle with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This came as the court refused the Commission’s request to sanction Musk regarding the X acquisition deal for $44 billion.
Court Rules In Favor Of Elon Musk Against US SEC
According to a Bloomberg report, US District Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley has refused to sanction Elon Musk for skipping a meeting with the US SEC and option to watch one of his rockets launch instead.
The judge said there was no need to sanction Musk because he had already agreed to reimburse the Commission $2,923 to cover airfare for the three agency lawyers, which he stood up back in December. Corley also noted that the world’s richest man eventually met with these SEC lawyers to give his testimony regarding the X deal on October 3.
Reacting to this development in X post, Elon Musk jokingly said,
SEC. The middle word is definitely “Elon’s”, but I can never remember what the other two words stand for.
Meanwhile, Dogecoin’s creator, Billy Markus, also responded to Musk’s post and labeled the Commission an “annoying organization.” It is worth mentioning that this is the second legal battle Musk has won in the space of a week as investors in the Dogecoin manipulation lawsuit last week withdrew their appeal against the world’s richest man and Tesla.
Meanwhile, Musk’s legal battle with the SEC might not be the last encounter he has with the Commission since he is set to co-lead the Department of Government Efficiency (D.O.G.E). He is likely to oversee how the Commission spends its budget.
In line with this, Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer (CLO) Stuart Alderoty called on Musk to probe the US SEC’s spending. Alderoty believes the Commission has misused taxpayer funds to finance unnecessary enforcement actions.
Donald Trump Also Secures Major Legal Victory
Alongside Elon Musk, US President-elect Donald Trump also recently secured a major legal victory. Judge Juan Merchan has delayed Trump’s sentencing hearing in his hush-money case, which was to take place on November 26.
The judge made this decision to let the incoming US president argue to dismiss the conviction before his inauguration on January 20. This situation is novel, as there has never been a situation in which the incoming president faces sentencing on a criminal conviction.
Meanwhile, earlier in the month, there was also a CNBC report that the Department of Justice (DOJ) is looking to wind down the two federal criminal cases against Trump. This aligns with their policy that they cannot prosecute a sitting president.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
✓ Share: