Will U.S. Tariffs Push Bitcoin to $220K or $70K? Analysts Split on Price Path

Airdrop Is Live 🔥 CaryptosHeadlines Media Has Launched Its Native Token CHT. Airdrop Is Live For Everyone, Claim Instant 5000 CHT Tokens Worth Of $50 USDT. Join the Airdrop at the official website, CryptosHeadlinesToken.com


– Advertisement –
  • Peterson’s LPF metric forecasts Bitcoin dip to $70k, citing historical bear market patterns and current trade tensions.
  • Sudden tariff rollout leaves markets volatile; Bitcoin’s short-term path hinges on investor response to trade policy shifts.

The Bitcoin bull cycle has likely concluded, according to analysis of on-chain metrics. A key indicator, the Realized Cap, measures the total capital entering Bitcoin based on the cost basis of coins moved on the blockchain.

This contrasts with Market Cap, which reflects Bitcoin’s price multiplied by its circulating supply. When Realized Cap rises while Market Cap stalls, it signals capital inflow without price growth—a pattern now observed in Bitcoin markets.

Realized Cap tracks actual purchases by assigning a value to each Bitcoin based on its last on-chain movement. For example, if a wallet acquires Bitcoin at $50,000, that price anchors its contribution to Realized Cap until the coins move again.

Market Cap, however, shifts with Bitcoin’s latest exchange price. Small trades can disproportionately impact Market Cap when sell orders are scarce. MicroStrategy’s strategy of issuing debt to buy Bitcoin illustrates this: limited capital deployment inflated their holdings’ paper value during low sell pressure.

So how can we tell if market cap is likely to rise relative to the capital being invested? Realized Cap shows how much actual money is entering the market, while Market Cap reflects how the price is reacting. If Realized Cap is growing but Market Cap is stagnant or falling, it means capital is flowing in, but prices aren’t rising—a classic bearish signal. On the flip side, if Realized Cap is flat while Market Cap is surging, it suggests that even a small amount of new capital is driving prices higher—a bullish sign. – Ki Young

Currently, Realized Cap growth outpaces Market Cap, indicating capital inflows without corresponding price gains. This divergence aligns with bear market conditions, where heightened sell pressure neutralizes buying activity. Historical data shows similar patterns precede prolonged downtrends. For instance, when Bitcoin neared $100,000, high trading volumes failed to lift prices due to excess selling.

U.S. Tariffs and Bitcoin’s Price Path: Analysts Weigh Conflicting Forecasts

New U.S. trade policies under former President Donald Trump have injected uncertainty into global markets. Starting April 5, a 10% tariff on all exports to the U.S. took effect, announced just three days prior.

Financial markets reacted swiftly, with analysts calling the move a direct challenge to international trade stability. Against this backdrop, Bitcoin faces diverging predictions: some see it as a hedge against turmoil, while others warn of short-term declines.

Trump’s tariff decision follows a pattern of abrupt policy shifts seen during his prior administration. Markets initially dipped as exporters braced for higher costs, but attention soon turned to cryptocurrencies.

One commentator argued that economic crises historically benefit Bitcoin, suggesting a potential surge to $220,000 if market conditions mirror 1987’s volatility. This view hinges on Bitcoin’s perceived role as a “safe haven” during periods of traditional asset sell-offs.

Not all analysts share this optimism. Timothy Peterson, a market strategist, projected on April 3 that Bitcoin could drop to $70,000 within ten days. His analysis relies on the “Lowest Price Forward” (LPF) metric, which tracks Bitcoin’s long-term floor prices by comparing past bear markets. Peterson’s chart shows that Bitcoin often retraces to specific levels before stabilizing, a pattern he believes will repeat.

The LPF model identifies support zones where buying activity traditionally offsets selling pressure. Peterson’s $70,000 target aligns with these historical trends. Trade disruptions could either drive investors toward Bitcoin as a non-sovereign asset or amplify risk aversion, pushing capital into traditional safe havens like gold or Treasuries.





Source link