Bitcoin financial services company, Swan Bitcoin has sued several former workers from its mining division. They allegedly stole software code from the company, quit, and then used the code to launch their mining operation.
The former employees allegedly started Proton Management, a “counterfeit competitor.” They persuaded Tether, a stablecoin issuer, to sever connections with Swan and collaborate with them instead. Earlier in July, Swan Bitcoin axed its managed mining unit and canceled its first public offering (IPO).
According to Swan Bitcoin lawyers, the court documents were filed on September 25. This was carried out with the aim of “unrecoverably damaging Swan’s market competitiveness.”
Cory Klippsten, Swan’s CEO took to X stating that the business has always operated its mining in a “distinct and isolated” manner. The most recent news, he said, has little bearing on Swan’s main line of business.
Swan Bitcoin Sues Former Execs And Proton Management
Swan Bitcoin was established in 2019 and provides investors with financial services. In 2023, it launched Swan Mining and expanded into the mining industry. Per the complaint, the defendants carried out a prearranged plot known as “rain and hellfire” to seize internal control of Swan’s mining company.
Swan Bitcoin claims that prior to their resignation between August 8 and August 9, the former workers took thousands of confidential papers as well as proprietary code for the company’s mining monitoring software.
Furthermore, the defendants are accused of poaching employees and swaying Swan’s business partners, such as Tether, a provider of stablecoin. The lawsuit also added that the corporation behind USDT aimed at providing a “legal facade” of the “counterfeit firm’s” wrongdoings.
Only a few days later, on August 12, after the defendants’ resignation, a major financial partner, Tether, replaced Swan with Proton in the mining contract. Altogether, both had also launched a managed mining service for institutional investors, with aspirations of connecting 100 exahashes by 2026. The outcome of this litigation may affect these plans in the future.
Swan Seeks Permanent Injunction And Return Of Materials
Swan claimed that this inappropriate conduct damages its operations immediately and irreversibly, resulting in lost commercial prospects and a damaged brand, in addition to violating contractual secrecy.
According to the civil complaint, Tether and the former workers had a planned approach whereby they attempted to destroy Swan’s mining company from the inside out. However, Swan has asked for the return of items taken without authorization and a permanent injunction against Proton. The verdict in this case may establish a standard for resolving IP conflicts in the cryptocurrency sector.
