Although Donald Trump has repeatedly attacked both Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and SEC Chair Gary Gensler-even hinting that he might remove them-it’s generally assumed that he lacks legal grounds to remove these confirmed officials in the absence of legal wrongdoing on their part.
But Harvard Law Professor and high-profile conservative jurist Adrian Vermeule disagrees. In fact, says Vermeule, Donald Trump does have the legal authority to remove both Powell and Gensler from office.
Donald Trump’s Power to Remove Jerome Powell, Gary Gensler – Legal Expert Weighs In
Harvard Law Professor Adrian Vermeule claims Trump has the legal authority to remove both Jerome Powell and Gary Gensler. Even though some legal precedents implied that independent agency leaders are not easily removable without cause – there are counter arguments as well.
Vermeule, former ACUS member and influential conservative jurist, , cited Article II’s removal power in the U.S. Constitution. This grants the President power to appoint and remove officers, with Senate consent.
Reminder — when discussing removal issues, don’t leap straight to the constitutional issues; check the statutes first. pic.twitter.com/Ci8iUavUtI
— Adrian Vermeule (@Vermeullarmine) November 9, 2024
This includes positions like Ambassadors, Supreme Court judges, and other U.S. officers appointed by law. However, Congress can assign the appointment of “inferior officers” solely to the President, the courts, or department heads.
Vermeule bases his conclusions on the landmark Myers v. United States case. In 1926, an 1876 law required the President to appoint and remove postmasters of the first, second, and third classes with Senate approval.
On the contrary, the President, Woodrow Wilson, removed Frank Myers, a first-class postmaster, without Senate approval.The Supreme Court ruled in Wilson’s favor, affirming the President’s sole power to remove executive officials without Senate consent. This decision strengthened the doctrine of presidential removal power, which could apply to officials like Jerome Powell and Gary Gensler.
Historical Debates Revived in Recent Cases
The current debates on presidential removal powers, applied to officials like Jerome Powell and Gary Gensler, have historical roots.
The Myers v. United States case established that the President can remove officers at will. This rule has an exception, where Congress limits removal power by vesting inferior officer appointments in department heads instead of the President.
Historically, this principle of removal has been tested and evolved through complex cases, including Morrison v. Olson and Seila Law, which highlighted ambiguities and limitations regarding the removal of inferior officers. This unresolved area of constitutional law has become current in debates over whether President Trump can remove Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and SEC Chair Gary Gensler.
Some legal scholars continue to believe, as James Madison first argued, that the President should have unfettered removal power over officers who wield executive power at his direction because such a “chain of dependence” is necessary to assure accountability on the part of the executive. The view is that if the principal officers, for instance, agency heads, can be removed by the President. Inferior officers should also exercise executive authority vested solely in the President.
Trump Eyes Transparency Overhaul at Fed, Clashing with Powell’s Leadership Style
Jerome Powell was reappointed by President Biden for a second term as Federal Reserve Chair, after being appointed by Trump in 2018. A private equity veteran, Powell has led the Fed through various economic challenges, though his management angered Trump, particularly regarding transparency.
Donald Trump reportedly discussed with the Fed his desire for live-streamed meetings and faster releases of meeting minutes, aiming to provide the public with quicker access to policy discussions.
Powell recently said that he would not step down if asked by President-elect Donald Trump. When asked directly, Powell replied, “No.” He further clarified that the president lacks the authority to fire or demote him, reinforcing his stance on the independence of the Federal Reserve. On the other hand, Gensler’s resignation is wanted by many more political actors. Just recently, the American Securities Association (ASA) recently called for his immediate resignation.
Teuta Franjkovic
Teuta is a seasoned writer and editor with over 15 years of experience in macroeconomics, technology, and the cryptocurrency and blockchain industries.
Starting her career in 2005 as a lifestyle writer for Cosmopolitan, she expanded into covering business and economy for several esteemed publications like Forbes and Bloomberg.
Influenced by figures like Don and Alex Tapscott and Laura Shin, Teuta embraced the blockchain revolution, believing crypto to be one of humanity’s most crucial inventions.
Her fintech involvement began in 2014, focusing on crypto, blockchain, NFTs, and Web3. Known for her excellent teamwork and communication skills, Teuta holds a double MA in Political Science and Law.
Disclaimer: The presented content may include the personal opinion of the author and is subject to market condition. Do your market research before investing in cryptocurrencies. The author or the publication does not hold any responsibility for your personal financial loss.
✓ Share: